|
mirror_mirror17
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Tanya Country: Canada Metro: Hamilton Birthday: 4/17/1985 Gender: Female
Interests: CT, Poetry, AFI, Count Chocola, Care Bears, Theatre, The Colour Pink, Diamonds, Marilyn Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, Frogs, Diet Coke, Vodka, Diet Red Bull, Steak, Strawberries, Vanilla Orchids, Yankees, Toronto Maple Leafs, Fondue Parties, and of course COFFEE! Occupation: Student
Message: message me
Member Since:
7/17/2005
|
|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| I have a bone to pick that I've been waiting to pick for a really long time.
Feminism. Scary word, isn't it? Properly used, it means:
1. Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes. 2. The movement organized around this belief.
But in the past few decades, the term has been twisted around to refer to the militant, extremist, misandrist (yes, ladies, not everyone's ganging up on women) women in the media who talk about how much they hate men.
So all of a sudden, something that was a positive thing (acknowledging your rights, standing up for yourself, free will) was warped into something shameful, something violent.
It always shocks me when girls or women say that they're not feminists. I wonder, what do they think it means? Because to me, being a woman and saying that you're not a feminist is like somebody saying that they don't believe in human rights. The majority of the people who say this believe that they are equal to men, that they should be able to pick whatever career they want, that they should be paid as much as men and that they should be free to do what they want with their own bodies, but they refuse to own the word feminism. In my opinion, men should term themselves as feminists too. It's not just a female thing... if you believe that your girlfriend, sister or mother should be equal in the eyes of society, are you not a feminist?
I want to stress the first definition of feminism above. Feminism is about "equality of the sexes". Equality. It's not, or at least it shouldn't be about power. It's not about "girl power", or "taking back the power" or demonizing men in any way. I think what scares a lot of men when they think about feminism is that we are trying to take something away from them. That's not true. Men don't have to live less for women to live more. That's just incorrect.
I really get frustrated when women don't let men have a say in issues of feminism. Because let's be honest here, women have it a lot better than we used to. Of course there are still double standards, and everything like that, but it's frustrating to me when women won't acknowledge the fact that many men suffer because of their gender, too. Saying "oh, you're a man, you've never been oppressed ever" is ignorant. There are many areas where men's rights are constantly looked over in favour of women's. For example, Steve was telling me a story about last year when he was watching a football practice. Two naked women streaked across the field and everybody clapped. Then two naked guys ran across. They got tackled, cuffed and escorted away by security, while the women got thumbs up. Now that's not fair, is it? It's not just women who suffer. We just suffer in different ways.
Think about it this way: most of the insults that guys use against other guys are about women or gays. They're either called, pussies, fags, or any other synonym and variation under the sun. Traits that are seen as undesirable in men are those that are generally associated with women. So don't you think that if men got a little bit more respect for women, they would make things a little easier on themselves too? All of a sudden female traits wouldn't be such a bad thing. Just a thought.
I think since I can see the other side of the spectrum, I would prefer to -ugh- "label" myself as a humanist rather than a feminist. Everybody should be able to live their lives in a way that makes them happy, without needing to live up to the proper standard of a man or a woman. This includes being a stay-at-home mom (or dad) without reprimand from working women for not living up to their true potential, being a working woman without fearing reprimand from stay-at-home moms for not being maternal enough, having sex with whomever you want without being labeled as a slut, not having sex with anybody without being labeled as a prude or a tease, being able to stand up for yourself without being called a bitch etc. etc. This also includes crying without being labeled a pussy, having a drink that actually tastes good without being labeled a fag, or having your feelings hurt without somebody saying "don't get blood on the chair". It's people like that, the labelers, the accusers, who make this world so difficult to be yourself in.
I wish people would think more critically sometimes... I know it's hard, but I just wish that for once, we could see somebody who is happy with themselves and just be happy for them instead of looking to see what's wrong with them. We're all wonderful! What's so wrong with that?
| | |
| Recently I've been thinking a lot about labels
and their importance (or lack thereof). I know that there have been
many times in the past where labels have frustrated me, even infuriated
me, to the point where I have thrown up my hands and screamed to the
gods, "NEVER MORE!!"
Let me give you an example:
In high school, I
drank. I abused substances that 'altered my state of mind'. I even
drank coffee because that any mind-altering substances that I put in my
body would increase my ability to cope in actual situations, or so I
thought at the time. I wish I were one of these people who could say “I
got high on life”. At the time, the emo scene was in full force. Being
in that crowd, generally, I became frequently exposed to the different
mindsets of this social group. And I became introduced to the so-called
"straight-edgers".
NOTHING INFURIATED ME MORE THAN STRAIGHT-EDGERS.
What got me so angry
was not the fact that they abstained from so many things - I had
secretly wanted the same lifestyle as they. It was the fact that they
needed to give it a NAME. As if their personal justification for their
lifestyle was not enough, they needed to make it COOL, make it a SOCIAL
MOVEMENT. Or, even worse, they only did the same things that the others
did because it WAS a movement. I truly believed (and still do today)
that if they believed enough in what they were doing, they didn't need
to give it a name. They could just do it, and live a good life without
having to explain and validate themselves and their choices to others.
As a more
well-not-so-recent example, I was speaking with my friend Kate at a
dinner a year ago. Kate was raised in a family of vegetarians, and
usually doesn't eat meat. But sometimes she does. She is not a
vegetarian because of animal rights; she's a vegetarian to promote
economic sustainability (which I would like to learn more about; I'd
never heard about this before, having never taken Global Studies).
Anyhow, Kate was saying that she doesn't think it's that bad to have
meat every once in a while, but that a lot of people wouldn't
understand that. Because of this lack of understanding, she usually
doesn't mention this aspect of her vegetarianism to people she first
meets.
This made me wonder: do people actually adjust their lifestyles so that the way they live fit into a label? If I were to define Kate's diet, I would label her as a "usual-vegetarian". But this makes her come off as wishy-washy.
But THAT'S THE POINT. Life IS wishy-washy.
It's not black-and-white, but people would like it to be. Do we live
our lives from day to day, constantly trying to adhere to black or
white, all the while wishing there were a happy medium?
If a gay man has sex
with a woman, does that make him a traitor? Or was he merely getting
the chance to enjoy one of life's many wonderful experiences? If a
liberal is practically a cookie-cutter leftie, but happens to support
capital punishment, does that make her a BAD liberal, or is that simply
natural variation in the human persona? I could give a million more
examples, but I think you get my point. People suppress parts of
themselves to fit into society's stereotypes for them.
Now I come to my second
point. When I suggested to Kate that she shouldn't change her lifestyle
just so it would fit into a label, she made a good point: WE NEED
LABELS. We need them to communicate ideas about others and ourselves to
other people. Most of us need them to have a sense of definition about
our selves.
But is that human nature? Or is that a product of our fast-paced society?
In a world where we summarize ourselves into 50 words or less in
personal ads, summarize our life experiences into a one-page resume, or
summarize a thesis paper that we've been working on for four years into
an abstract that is 100 words long, why wouldn't we feel the need to
summarize our entire belief systems into one word - "carnivore",
"liberal", "heterosexual", "atheist"- even if we don't feel as though
that word completely fits? In a world where we rarely converse with
somebody for more than 10 minutes at a time, and the extent to which we
know most people (in my age bracket) consists of "what's your name?",
"where are you from?", and "what's your major?", who has the time to
spend discussing exactly who they are? And why does that seem horribly,
horribly wrong to me?
Humans are complex
creatures. We all, especially at my age, are constantly developing and
tweaking our belief systems to fit what is right for us. And that's
hard enough; we shouldn't have to tweak further to make that already
tweaked version of us fit society's mad-scientist obsession with
categorization. I don't want to fit my personality into 50 words or less; I want my self to fill volumes.
I'll leave you with a
quote that I believe fits the topic quite well; it's also one of my
favourites. It's by Alfred Kinsey, a very, very influential man.
"The world is not to be
divided into sheep and goats. Not all things are black nor all things
white. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with
discrete categories. Only the human mind invents categories and tries
to force facts into separated pigeonholes. The living world is a
continuum in each and every one of its aspects."
Have a good weekend, my
loves. Try and get to know someone in this way; I think it will be
rewarding. And if you'd ever like to know more about any of the
multi-faceted, wishy-washy, shades of grey aspects of my personality,
I'd be more than happy to share. 
- Tanya
(P.S. I just thought of
something else, but I couldn't fit it in anywhere in my blog. I once
got yelled at for being a "fence-sitter"! My English teacher in high
school, Mr. Menka, taught our philosophy class, and one day we were
learning about the different kinds of belief in god [you know the
drill: theism, deism, pantheism, atheism, agnosticism, etc.]. And
everyone in the class had to pick where they fit on the spectrum. And I
was the only person in the class who didn't fit on the spectrum.
Nothing on there fit with what I believe! And Mr. Menka said, "you have
to pick, Tanya. Nobody values a fence-sitter." And I said, "No, I do
not have to pick, I don't FIT in the SPECTRUM!" After that, for like a
week, he would ask me whenever he saw me "So have you decided where you
fit yet??" To this day I'm still not sure if he was just playing
devil's advocate, or if he actually was such a strict "categorizer".)
| | |
| Which spice girl did you like? ginger.
Backstreet Boys or N*Sync?
60% n*sync, 40% bsb
Did you watch S Club 7?
holy smokes, yes.
What was your favorite, Sandlot or Little Rascals?
51% little rascals 49% sandlot
Did you ever have light up sneakers?
hahah YES! and they were hightops
Cinderella or Snow White?
snow white because dark hair + pale skin = babetastic
What was your favorite holiday?
halloween or my birthday
Did you ever try to stay up on Christmas just so you could see santa?
no, i slept a lot as a child. much like now.
You ever watch Bill Nye the Science Guy?
yes. and karen would punch me every time they would say, "bill" in the theme song.
What grade did you like the best?
grade 5 was a solid year.
Ninja Turtles or Power Rangers?
obvoiusly power rangers but ninja turtles were still amazing
What Power Ranger were you?
pink. and i always made my sister be the stupid yellow one
Did you ever own a Chinese jump rope?
i have no idea what that is...
What was your favorite thing to eat?
tomatoes and chick peas. i was a weeeeeeeird kid.
What was your favorite color? red i think
Did you prefer, Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego or Where’s Waldo?
carmen sandiego BUT magic eye kicked both their asses
Do you ever miss being a little kid??
ya but i was a lot uglier then
What was your first pet’s name? Rolly (dog.. after the 101 dalmatians)
Who was your best friend in kindergarten?
Jessamyn Roach
Are you still friends with the person you were best friends with?
yes!
How many times have you switched schools including preschool?
four
What did you want to be when you grew up?
a laywer or an actress (HA!)
What was your all time favorite movie?
home alone.
Which did you like ‘Are You Afraid Of The Dark’ or ‘AHH! Real Monsters?
are you afraid of the dark. it had carlos from magic school bus AND chris from student bodies!
Did you watch Rocko’s Modern Life?
hahha yes.
Did you collect pogs?
did i ever. i even splurged on a fancy pink pog holder.
Who was your favorite character in Doug?
skeeter. but i actually hated that show.
Did you like War Heads?
nope
Favorite rugrat?
phil and lil. or chucky. | | |
| there's an enchoing thump when her body meets the floor... arms and legs rolling in opposite directions - like beads torn from a necklace...
... and what's worse than her death is not being able to hold her hand.
RIP Grandma T 05/18/08 RIP Grandma Liz 04/20/08 RIP Grandma Doreen 02/17/08
| | |
| Isn't it funny how wildly inappropriate the love you can have for
someone can be? I don't mean, like, loving somebody when you shouldn't,
or having an affair, or loving someone unattainable. I mean, when
you're 13: you think about the man or woman you're going to spend the
rest of your life with someday, and you have this set picture of what
they should look like. Usually, it's a "type"... the wild, rebellious
type, the sensitive artistic type, the knight-in-shining-armour type,
etc.
But then one day, when you're older, you fall in love for real. And they're nothing like who you we're expecting. They're wildly inappropriate.
Instead of falling for the idealistic, liberal, convention-shunning
activist, you fall for a conservative business major, who is a hopeless
romantic and makes jokes that a 60-year-old would make (okay so maybe
I've stopped being theoretical and am just talking about myself now).
And they're unexpected. Why you've fallen in love with them, you don't
know, but you have, and it's wonderful.
You don't know how you
can mesh two lives together when your backgrounds are so different. But then
you come to realise that your other doesn't have to reflect who you
are. You love who you love, it's no conscious decision. You come to
realise that you don't fall in love with types, you fall in love with qualities. And you come to realise that this love, is just what you've been looking for: just not what you were expecting.
Here's
to the best kind of love: the kind that takes you by surprise,
challenges who you think you are, and brings you new perspective.
Cheers!
| | |
|