Xanga Layouts

mirror_mirror17
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit mirror_mirror17's Xanga Site!

Name: Tanya
Country: Canada
Metro: Hamilton
Birthday: 4/17/1985
Gender: Female


Interests: CT, Poetry, AFI, Count Chocola, Care Bears, Theatre, The Colour Pink, Diamonds, Marilyn Monroe, Audrey Hepburn, Frogs, Diet Coke, Vodka, Diet Red Bull, Steak, Strawberries, Vanilla Orchids, Yankees, Toronto Maple Leafs, Fondue Parties, and of course COFFEE!
Occupation: Student


Message: message me


Member Since: 7/17/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
Gallaudetians, live and propser!
previous - random - next

ERNEST C. DRURY SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF
previous - random - next

Deaf Canadians!
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Sunday, November 16, 2008

the woman in me.

I have a bone to pick that I've been waiting to pick for a really long time.

Feminism. Scary word, isn't it? Properly used, it means:

   1. Belief in the social, political, and economic equality of the sexes.
   2. The movement organized around this belief.

But in the past few decades, the term has been twisted around to refer to the militant, extremist, misandrist (yes, ladies, not everyone's ganging up on women) women in the media who talk about how much they hate men.

So all of a sudden, something that was a positive thing (acknowledging your rights, standing up for yourself, free will) was warped into something shameful, something violent.

It always shocks me when girls or women say that they're not feminists. I wonder, what do they think it means? Because to me, being a woman and saying that you're not a feminist is like somebody saying that they don't believe in human rights. The majority of the people who say this believe that they are equal to men, that they should be able to pick whatever career they want, that they should be paid as much as men and that they should be free to do what they want with their own bodies, but they refuse to own the word feminism. In my opinion, men should term themselves as feminists too. It's not just a female thing... if you believe that your girlfriend, sister or mother should be equal in the eyes of society, are you not a feminist?

I want to stress the first definition of feminism above. Feminism is about "equality of the sexes". Equality. It's not, or at least it shouldn't be about power. It's not about "girl power", or "taking back the power" or demonizing men in any way. I think what scares a lot of men when they think about feminism is that we are trying to take something away from them. That's not true. Men don't have to live less for women to live more. That's just incorrect.

I really get frustrated when women don't let men have a say in issues of feminism. Because let's be honest here, women have it a lot better than we used to. Of course there are still double standards, and everything like that, but it's frustrating to me when women won't acknowledge the fact that many men suffer because of their gender, too. Saying "oh, you're a man, you've never been oppressed ever" is ignorant. There are many areas where men's rights are constantly looked over in favour of women's. For example, Steve was telling me a story about last year when he was watching a football practice. Two naked women streaked across the field and everybody clapped. Then two naked guys ran across. They got tackled, cuffed and escorted away by security, while the women got thumbs up. Now that's not fair, is it? It's not just women who suffer. We just suffer in different ways.

Think about it this way: most of the insults that guys use against other guys are about women or gays. They're either called, pussies, fags, or any other synonym and variation under the sun. Traits that are seen as undesirable in men are those that are generally associated with women. So don't you think that if men got a little bit more respect for women, they would make things a little easier on themselves too? All of a sudden female traits wouldn't be such a bad thing. Just a thought.

I think since I can see the other side of the spectrum, I would prefer to -ugh- "label" myself as a humanist rather than a feminist. Everybody should be able to live their lives in a way that makes them happy, without needing to live up to the proper standard of a man or a woman. This includes being a stay-at-home mom (or dad) without reprimand from working women for not living up to their true potential, being a working woman without fearing reprimand from stay-at-home moms for not being maternal enough, having sex with whomever you want without being labeled as a slut, not having sex with anybody without being labeled as a prude or a tease, being able to stand up for yourself without being called a bitch etc. etc. This also includes crying without being labeled a pussy, having a drink that actually tastes good without being labeled a fag, or having your feelings hurt without somebody saying "don't get blood on the chair". It's people like that, the labelers, the accusers, who make this world so difficult to be yourself in.

I wish people would think more critically sometimes... I know it's hard, but I just wish that for once, we could see somebody who is happy with themselves and just be happy for them instead of looking to see what's wrong with them. We're all wonderful! What's so wrong with that?



Friday, June 06, 2008

if only life were black and white.

Recently I've been thinking a lot about labels and their importance (or lack thereof). I know that there have been many times in the past where labels have frustrated me, even infuriated me, to the point where I have thrown up my hands and screamed to the gods, "NEVER MORE!!"

Let me give you an example:

In high school, I drank. I abused substances that 'altered my state of mind'. I even drank coffee because that any mind-altering substances that I put in my body would increase my ability to cope in actual situations, or so I thought at the time. I wish I were one of these people who could say “I got high on life”. At the time, the emo scene was in full force. Being in that crowd, generally, I became frequently exposed to the different mindsets of this social group. And I became introduced to the so-called "straight-edgers".

NOTHING INFURIATED ME MORE THAN STRAIGHT-EDGERS.

What got me so angry was not the fact that they abstained from so many things - I had secretly wanted the same lifestyle as they. It was the fact that they needed to give it a NAME. As if their personal justification for their lifestyle was not enough, they needed to make it COOL, make it a SOCIAL MOVEMENT. Or, even worse, they only did the same things that the others did because it WAS a movement. I truly believed (and still do today) that if they believed enough in what they were doing, they didn't need to give it a name. They could just do it, and live a good life without having to explain and validate themselves and their choices to others.

As a more well-not-so-recent example, I was speaking with my friend Kate at a dinner a year ago. Kate was raised in a family of vegetarians, and usually doesn't eat meat. But sometimes she does. She is not a vegetarian because of animal rights; she's a vegetarian to promote economic sustainability (which I would like to learn more about; I'd never heard about this before, having never taken Global Studies). Anyhow, Kate was saying that she doesn't think it's that bad to have meat every once in a while, but that a lot of people wouldn't understand that. Because of this lack of understanding, she usually doesn't mention this aspect of her vegetarianism to people she first meets.

This made me wonder: do people actually adjust their lifestyles so that the way they live fit into a label? If I were to define Kate's diet, I would label her as a "usual-vegetarian". But this makes her come off as wishy-washy.

But THAT'S THE POINT. Life IS wishy-washy. It's not black-and-white, but people would like it to be. Do we live our lives from day to day, constantly trying to adhere to black or white, all the while wishing there were a happy medium?

If a gay man has sex with a woman, does that make him a traitor? Or was he merely getting the chance to enjoy one of life's many wonderful experiences? If a liberal is practically a cookie-cutter leftie, but happens to support capital punishment, does that make her a BAD liberal, or is that simply natural variation in the human persona? I could give a million more examples, but I think you get my point. People suppress parts of themselves to fit into society's stereotypes for them.

Now I come to my second point. When I suggested to Kate that she shouldn't change her lifestyle just so it would fit into a label, she made a good point: WE NEED LABELS. We need them to communicate ideas about others and ourselves to other people. Most of us need them to have a sense of definition about our selves.

But is that human nature? Or is that a product of our fast-paced society? In a world where we summarize ourselves into 50 words or less in personal ads, summarize our life experiences into a one-page resume, or summarize a thesis paper that we've been working on for four years into an abstract that is 100 words long, why wouldn't we feel the need to summarize our entire belief systems into one word - "carnivore", "liberal", "heterosexual", "atheist"- even if we don't feel as though that word completely fits? In a world where we rarely converse with somebody for more than 10 minutes at a time, and the extent to which we know most people (in my age bracket) consists of "what's your name?", "where are you from?", and "what's your major?", who has the time to spend discussing exactly who they are? And why does that seem horribly, horribly wrong to me?

Humans are complex creatures. We all, especially at my age, are constantly developing and tweaking our belief systems to fit what is right for us. And that's hard enough; we shouldn't have to tweak further to make that already tweaked version of us fit society's mad-scientist obsession with categorization. I don't want to fit my personality into 50 words or less; I want my self to fill volumes.

I'll leave you with a quote that I believe fits the topic quite well; it's also one of my favourites. It's by Alfred Kinsey, a very, very influential man.

"The world is not to be divided into sheep and goats. Not all things are black nor all things white. It is a fundamental of taxonomy that nature rarely deals with discrete categories. Only the human mind invents categories and tries to force facts into separated pigeonholes. The living world is a continuum in each and every one of its aspects."

Have a good weekend, my loves. Try and get to know someone in this way; I think it will be rewarding. And if you'd ever like to know more about any of the multi-faceted, wishy-washy, shades of grey aspects of my personality, I'd be more than happy to share.

- Tanya

(P.S. I just thought of something else, but I couldn't fit it in anywhere in my blog. I once got yelled at for being a "fence-sitter"! My English teacher in high school, Mr. Menka, taught our philosophy class, and one day we were learning about the different kinds of belief in god [you know the drill: theism, deism, pantheism, atheism, agnosticism, etc.]. And everyone in the class had to pick where they fit on the spectrum. And I was the only person in the class who didn't fit on the spectrum. Nothing on there fit with what I believe! And Mr. Menka said, "you have to pick, Tanya. Nobody values a fence-sitter." And I said, "No, I do not have to pick, I don't FIT in the SPECTRUM!" After that, for like a week, he would ask me whenever he saw me "So have you decided where you fit yet??" To this day I'm still not sure if he was just playing devil's advocate, or if he actually was such a strict "categorizer".)



Friday, May 23, 2008

child of the 90's

Which spice girl did you like?
ginger.

Backstreet Boys or N*Sync?
60% n*sync, 40% bsb

Did you watch S Club 7?
holy smokes, yes.

What was your favorite, Sandlot or Little Rascals?
51% little rascals 49% sandlot

Did you ever have light up sneakers?
hahah YES! and they were hightops

Cinderella or Snow White?
snow white because dark hair + pale skin = babetastic

What was your favorite holiday?
halloween or my birthday

Did you ever try to stay up on Christmas just so you could see santa?
no, i slept a lot as a child. much like now.

You ever watch Bill Nye the Science Guy?
yes. and karen would punch me every time they would say, "bill" in the theme song.

What grade did you like the best?
grade 5 was a solid year.

Ninja Turtles or Power Rangers?
obvoiusly power rangers but ninja turtles were still amazing

What Power Ranger were you?
pink. and i always made my sister be the stupid yellow one

Did you ever own a Chinese jump rope?
i have no idea what that is...

What was your favorite thing to eat?
tomatoes and chick peas. i was a weeeeeeeird kid.

What was your favorite color?
 red i think

Did you prefer, Where in the World is Carmen Sandiego or Where’s Waldo?
carmen sandiego BUT magic eye kicked both their asses

Do you ever miss being a little kid??
ya but i was a lot uglier then

What was your first pet’s name?
Rolly (dog.. after the 101 dalmatians)

Who was your best friend in kindergarten?
Jessamyn Roach

Are you still friends with the person you were best friends with?
yes!

How many times have you switched schools including preschool?
four

What did you want to be when you grew up?
a laywer or an actress (HA!)

What was your all time favorite movie?
home alone.

Which did you like ‘Are You Afraid Of The Dark’ or ‘AHH! Real Monsters?
are you afraid of the dark. it had carlos from magic school bus AND chris from student bodies!

Did you watch Rocko’s Modern Life?
hahha yes.

Did you collect pogs?
did i ever. i even splurged on a fancy pink pog holder.

Who was your favorite character in Doug?
skeeter. but i actually hated that show.

Did you like War Heads?
nope

Favorite rugrat?
phil and lil. or chucky.


Monday, May 19, 2008

cancer

there's an enchoing thump when her body meets the floor... arms and legs rolling in opposite directions - like beads torn from a necklace...

... and what's worse than her death is not being able to hold her hand.

RIP Grandma T  05/18/08
RIP Grandma Liz  04/20/08
RIP Grandma Doreen 02/17/08


Monday, March 17, 2008

ying/yang

Isn't it funny how wildly inappropriate the love you can have for someone can be? I don't mean, like, loving somebody when you shouldn't, or having an affair, or loving someone unattainable. I mean, when you're 13: you think about the man or woman you're going to spend the rest of your life with someday, and you have this set picture of what they should look like. Usually, it's a "type"... the wild, rebellious type, the sensitive artistic type, the knight-in-shining-armour type, etc.

But then one day, when you're older, you fall in love for real. And they're nothing like who you we're expecting. They're wildly inappropriate. Instead of falling for the idealistic, liberal, convention-shunning activist, you fall for a conservative business major, who is a hopeless romantic and makes jokes that a 60-year-old would make (okay so maybe I've stopped being theoretical and am just talking about myself now). And they're unexpected. Why you've fallen in love with them, you don't know, but you have, and it's wonderful.

You don't know how you can mesh two lives together when your backgrounds are so different. But then you come to realise that your other doesn't have to reflect who you are. You love who you love, it's no conscious decision. You come to realise that you don't fall in love with types, you fall in love with qualities. And you come to realise that this love, is just what you've been looking for: just not what you were expecting.

Here's to the best kind of love: the kind that takes you by surprise, challenges who you think you are, and brings you new perspective.

Cheers!



Next 5 >>